Gun Control at Work…

The Knox Report

From the Firearms Coalition

 

It’s the Guns Stupid…Right?

 

By Jeff Knox

 

(June 19, 2008) June 8 of this year was the anniversary of a horrible mass murder and on that day another attack, almost as deadly and just as senseless, took place.  On June 8, 2001 a deranged man walked into an elementary school and murdered 8 children and injured 15 other students and school staff members.  The more recent attack was aimed at random innocents enjoying a beautiful Sunday in a busy shopping district.

The murderer started his attack by driving into a crowd of shoppers and using his vehicle as a weapon, slamming into panicking pedestrians before leaping out and executing some of the injured.  Panicked shoppers tried to flee as the murderer rampaged through the crowds indiscriminately killing and maiming.  The final toll was 7 dead and 10 injured.

Unlike many such attacks during which the targets of the attack were trapped inside a relatively small space, this recent outrage took place in the open streets where there was plenty of room to run.  Still, that wasn’t enough to save the 17 victims. 

Continue reading Gun Control at Work…

Cops Shooting Straight

    For decades the public has been inundated with bogus, anti-gun, anti-rights propaganda spouted from the offices of Police Chiefs and other high-profile police political appointees and their vassals who hope to someday become political appointees themselves.  The gun rights movement has countered this propaganda by insisting that these anti-rights opinions do not apply to rank-and-file officers on the streets.  Organizations like the Law Enforcement Alliance of America (LEAA) help to bolster that position, but their close association with the NRA hurts their credibility. 

    Now a new force in the argument is emerging and it is proving what pro-rights advocates have been saying all along.  The internet, with its Blogs, forums, and other web sites is proving that line cops by-and-large understand that the Constitution means what it says and that they recognize armed citizens as allies, not threats.  Clearly there are many officers who need more education regarding the rights of citizens and the limits of police powers, but the internet is helping there too.

    A good case in point is a recent Blog entry by Frank Borelli, Editor in Chief of Officer.com , discussing the current situation in our nation's capitol.  Borelli contends that the District of Columbia should be the shining example of Constitutional integrity.  That the DC gun ban should never have even been considered and should have been dumped as soon as it was seen that it didn't work.  He goes on to criticize recent DC police activities where they cordoned off a certain section of town and stopped people entering and leaving, demanding identification and a "valid" reason for being in the area.  In past entries Borelli has espoused the value of officers spending personal time on the range and the importance of the "Constitution vs. Convenience."

    We in the gun rights community need to make extra efforts to reach out to members of law enforcement through these web sites and in person.  We need to help educate the undereducated and encourage those who put forward strong clear thinking on Constitutional matters.

    Recent incidents in Virginia and Pennsylvania where officers overreacted to citizens lawfully carrying firearms openly, point up the need for continuing education, and web sites like Officer.com can be a useful venue for such education.  All police powers are derived – on loan – from "we the people" and are retained by us even while they are on loan to the government.  When police and government forget this simple fact, tyranny has gained a foothold.

     

Court Says No to Olofson.

Court denies Olofson’s bid to stay out of jail pending appeal.

David Olofson was convicted in January of illegally transferring a machinegun after a 20-year old AR-15 he had loaned to a friend fired two short multi-round bursts.  Last month he was sentenced to 30 months in prison, but his attorney immediately filed an appeal in the Federal Appeals Court for the 7th Circuit.  Along with the appeal, they filed a motion to allow the Army reservist and father of three to remain free until the appeal is settled.  While Olofson’s appeal could drag out for quite some time, early in June, a three-judge panel of the court said they would not keep Olfson out of jail in the interim. 

It is likely that Olofson will remain free for several more weeks due to backlogs in the system, but as soon as the government incarcerators catch up a little David Olofson will have to begin serving his sentence.

Continue reading Court Says No to Olofson.

Future Sight?

The Knox Report

From the Firearms Coalition

 

The Past Illuminates the Future

 

By Jeff Knox

(June 3, 2008) Now that all practical doubt has been removed as to who the Democrat and Republican candidates for President are going to be, let’s look forward to what the future might hold.  Is there doom and gloom on the horizon or is tomorrow a bright new day?

I haven’t found anyone in the firearms rights community who is looking forward to a brighter tomorrow.  All of the arguments I hear are about which candidate is more of a threat to gun rights.  While most believe Obama, with his far-left philosophy and horrible record on guns must be defeated at all costs, there is a vocal minority who are convinced that McCain, in spite of his solid pro-gun voting record, is more dangerous, citing his past betrayals and “maverick” deal making.  A third camp suggests that the only thing that will bring our country back from the brink is a disastrous Democrat presidency, pointing out that it was Jimmy Carter’s train wreck that swept Ronald Reagan into office and Democrats overreaching that led to the “Republican Revolution” in 1994.

Continue reading Future Sight?

Shooting for The Future

Last year I wrote an article for Handguns magazine titled Shooting for the Future about the basics of introducing new folks to the fun of shooting.  That article is now available on the internet at the magazine's web stie and can be viewed by clicking here.

I would invite everyone to take a look at it and let me – and the editors – know what you think about it.  Unless you happen to dislike the article for some reason in which case I would encourage you to keep that opinion to yourself. Laughing