All posts by Chris Knox

Obama’s Biggest Frustration? Reality.

(June 12, 2014) Obama’s talk of gun control is a political diversion.  When the President of the United States is asked about his proudest achievements and his greatest frustrations in office, and his response is to decry the lack of action to restrict the enumerated constitutional rights of Americans, that’s a diversion.  Obama could have talked about the slow creeping economic “recovery.”  He could have talked about the nation’s astronomical, and growing, debt.  He could have mentioned the failure to develop anything close to a balanced budget.  He could have talked about the loss of life in Iraq and Afghanistan – and the crumbling of progress toward freedom for the people in those countries, particularly women – the mistakes leading to and following the attack in Benghazi, the brouhaha over federal law enforcement selling guns to Mexican traffickers in total disregard of the consequences of that action, the total failure of his vision for “clean” energy, the growing instability of the dollar in the world market, or hundreds of other pressing, serious, and crushing problems, but he didn’t.  Instead he talked about “gun violence” and Congress’ “failure” to enact restrictions on Americans’ fundamental, constitutional right to keep and bear arms. 

Deaths of children in schools, and demented individuals going on murderous rampages are absolutely terrible problems that need to be seriously addressed, but all evidence shows that none of the proposals Obama complained about could have or would have had the slightest impact on those tragedies.

Obama himself unintentionally admitted both the futility of his “modest” gun control proposals, and the real objective of those proposals as steps toward a bigger goal, when he praised the draconian response of Australia to a mass murder.  They almost completely banned the private possession of firearms, and instituted harsh restrictions on the few guns left in civilian hands.  That nation had been slowly creeping down a path of “reasonable” restrictions for decades, but when one violent lunatic committed an unspeakable atrocity, the “modest” and “reasonable” measures were shown to be merely the launch pad for sweeping bans, confiscations, and criminalization.

But that argument is the distraction.

Continue reading Obama’s Biggest Frustration? Reality.

Still They Continue to Blame the Guns

It’s the Murderer Stupid!

Last Friday, as people began celebrating their extended Memorial Day weekend, one demented little narcissist took a knife and slaughtered 3 innocent people in the opening act of a really bad play he called his “Day of Retribution.”  He went on to kill three others and severely injure several more before finally taking his own worthless life.

Before I go on, let me make something really clear: I believe that all media, myself included, have a responsibility to avoid glorifying wanton criminals, minimizing reporting about the murderer.  The efficacy of this approach has been proven in studies concerning the reporting of suicides.*  I personally take that a step further by actively denigrating, shaming, and belittling the pathetic deviants for their evil actions.  As a policy, I never repeat the name of one of these loathsome rodents, nor do I publish their pictures or their idiotic rantings, because doing so feeds the beast.  It gives them what they wanted – fame and recognition – and it helps to motivate the next iteration of a murdering scumbag that we know is waiting in the wings looking for the trigger to change his life and make him “famous.”  If all media would adopt a similar attitude toward these low-life no-accounts, I believe we would not see such aberrations occurring as often as we currently do.

In the most recent case, there are strong indications that the murderer was emulating a movie about another murderer, and there is some indication that his whole idea for a “Day of Retribution” – and the resulting “fame” – might have been triggered by news coverage of the Sandy Hook atrocity.  Unfortunately, I see a high probability of this murderer’s story being turned into a feature film to help fuel demented sickos for years to come. 

Continue reading Still They Continue to Blame the Guns

New Exploitation of Gun Free Zones

Not So Stupid Criminals

By Jeff Knox

(May 22, 2014) We all love those “Stupid Criminal” stories, like the guy pretending to cash a check before pulling a gun and robbing the bank – leaving the check and his Driver’s License on the counter, or the guys who broke into the gun store by breaking a hole in the roof only to find all of the guns locked in safes, the windows barred, the alarm going off, and no ladder to get back up through the hole…  But, while low IQ is a common trait of criminals, even slow learners can still learn.

Back in 1987, when Florida passed their highly publicized law liberalizing concealed carry of firearms, criminals figured out that it was safer to target tourists – who were less likely to be legally armed.  This became so prevalent that many rental car companies removed identifying stickers and license plate frames from their cars as a precautionary measure. 

Now enterprising criminals have begun targeting vehicles with decals and bumper stickers advertising an enthusiasm for firearms.  That alone isn’t really new; gun owners have for years recognized that an NRA sticker or a decal from their favorite gun company on their vehicle is a double-edged sword.  On the one hand, it announces that the vehicle’s owner probably owns guns and that someone looking to steal guns might target them.  On the other hand, it announces that the owner probably owns guns and that anyone trying to steal from them runs an elevated risk of being shot.  What is new is the fact that criminals are now targeting gun-labeled vehicles specifically when they’re in the parking lots of guns-prohibited places.

Continue reading New Exploitation of Gun Free Zones

Drake v. Jerejian

Supreme Court Side-Steps Second Amendment Again

Once again, the US Supreme Court has refused to hear an appeal in a case concerning the Second Amendment and bearing arms for self-defense outside the home.  On Monday May 5, without comment, the Court rejected the case of Drake, et al. v. Jerejian.  The case challenged New Jersey’s law regarding concealed carry.  Under that law, a person applying for a license to carry a concealed firearm must prove a “justifiable need” to even be considered, and can still be denied at the whim of local law enforcement.  The “justifiable need” provision requires that the person prove “specific threats or previous attacks demonstrating a special danger to applicant’s life that cannot be avoided by other means.”  The plaintiffs in the Drake case included a man who restocks ATM money machines, a Reserve Sheriff’s Deputy, a civilian employee of the FBI, and a person who was the victim in an interstate kidnapping.  All of them had been denied the right to carry by New Jersey’s system.

The Federal Appeals Court for the 3rd Circuit (NJ, PA, DE, and PR) ruled that the law’s stringent requirements are not a violation of the Second Amendment right to bear arms.  By refusing to review that ruling, the Supreme Court allows that 3rd Circuit ruling to stand.  In recent months, similar rulings in similar cases challenging carry restrictions in New York and Maryland were also ruled constitutional by the 2nd and 4th Circuit Courts (NY, VT, CT, and RI, and WV, VA, MD, NC, and SC respectively) and were refused review by the Supreme Court.

Continue reading Drake v. Jerejian

Reciprocity Problems in PA

PA Reciprocity Problems

 
Our friends in Pennsylvania need our help.
 
Their Attorney General has taken it upon herself to ignore the statutory limits on her power and modify – and even cancel – longstanding reciprocity agreements with other states.  Recently she has made changes to the reciprocity agreements with Virginia, Florida, and Arizona, and she has canceled reciprocity agreements with Idaho and Utah.
 
I suspect that Mike Bloomberg or the Legal Center Against Violence – or whatever those rights-hating San Francisco lawyers are calling themselves this week – have been whispering in the AG’s ear and convinced her that she can get away with this BS.  If that’s the case, be on the lookout for similar actions in other states.
 
Right now, we need to put pressure on Pennsylvania politicians to rein in the AG and force her to respect the rights of Pennsylvanians and folks who would like to visit that state.
 
If you are a PA resident, please contact your state legislators demanding that they get their Attorney General under control.
 
Whether you’re a PA resident or not, please let the Governor know that you’re not happy about the situation.  Not only does this mean that those of us wishing to visit PA are more likely to have problems carrying our personal defense arms, but Pennsylvanians wishing to visit other states are now at greater risk.
 
Tourism is a major industry in Pennsylvania and that got a boost a few years ago when the National Park Service ban on lawful carry on NPS lands was lifted – opening up battlefield parks like Gettysburg to those of us who avoid going where we can’t go armed.  That is now being jeopardized by the extra-statutory actions of this rogue AG.
 
If you’ve ever considered visiting Pennsylvania, let the Governor know that those plans are on hold until such time as the PA AG stops threatening the rights of responsible, licensed, law-abiding visitors.
 
The Governor’s email address is: Governor@PA.gov
 
Here is the note I’ve sent him.  Please use it as a guide to send him a note of your own to let him know that his AG is costing his state business. You don’t have to say a lot, just let him know you’re not happy and you’re going to avoid 
 
Dear Governor Corbett:
 
I’m very disappointed to learn that your Attorney General, Kathleen Kane, has chosen to exceed her statutory authority and modify or delete reciprocity agreements concerning the discreet carry of personal defense firearms.  My home state of Arizona and the state of Utah, where I have maintained a non-resident permit for a number of years, have been targeted.
While it is possible that I personally could legally carry my firearm in Pennsylvania – as I have been lawfully and responsibly doing for over three decades all over this country, I will not lend my support and tourist dollars to a state that is actively trying to infringe on my, and my fellow citizens’ rights.
I guess I’ll take my grandson to visit the Manassas and Fredericksburg, Virginia battlefields instead of Gettysburg this summer.  I’m also letting my friends know about this situation and encouraging them to suspend any planned visits to PA and to avoid doing business with PA-based businesses until this situation is resolved.
I hope you and the legislature will act quickly to bring this rogue politician into compliance with PA statutes and demonstrate that Pennsylvania still respects individual rights.  
Please let me know when your state is again open for business and tourism.
 
Sincerely,
 
    Jeff Knox
    Buckeye, Arizona
 

The Governor is a Republican and generally friendly to our cause.  Let him know that the gun-unfriendly Democrat AG is hurting his state with her overreaching, extra-statutory meddling.  Please send a quick note to Governor Corbett right now, then forward this Alert to your rights-supporting friends.

Primary Season

Primary season has already started.  Primary dates vary in each state, but it is a great opportunity for you to have an impact because so few people vote in the primaries.  Inexplicably, the NRA does not make endorsements in contested primaries – denying pro-rights candidates their support, and often leaving voters with a choice between two anti-rights candidates in November.

Jeff Knox takes a look at the importance of primaries in the latest Knox Report, now available at www.FirearmsCoalition.org.

If you’re not receiving our bi-monthly newsletter, The Hard Corps Report, please consider subscribing at www.FirearmsCoalition.org.  Also please consider making a donation to help us in the fight.

Please help us spread the word by “Liking” us on Facebook, and sharing our columns and information with your friends and family. 
Together we can protect our rights and save our republic.

Yours for the Second Amendment,

The Firearms Coalition
Inline image 1

This E-Alert was sent from The Firearms Coalition to our friends and supporters.  If it was forwarded to you, you can register for Alerts and Updates at www.FirearmsCoaliton.org.  We never share or sell your information. 

Primary Responsibility

Primary Responsibility
Choose now or have no choice later.

By Jeff Knox

(May 16, 2014) Primary season is in full swing and most of America hasn’t even noticed.  Primaries have already been conducted in some states and are imminent in many more.  Primaries are the single point in the electoral process where you have the most influence and your vote has the most leverage.  During the primaries, not only do relatively few voters participate, but because there are often several candidates for a given office, the votes are spread out, meaning that a very small number of votes can make the difference between winning and losing.  Some states run two-stage primaries, holding a runoff between the top vote-getters if no one receives better than 50% of the votes cast in the first ballot.

For some unfathomable reason, the National Rifle Association does not grade or endorse candidates in contested primaries.  This often contributes to really good, pro-Second Amendment candidates being narrowly defeated, leaving voters in the general election to pick between “bad” and “worse.”  Other national rights organizations, such as Gun Owners of America, get involved in primaries, but they have less reach and fewer resources than does the NRA.  Many local grassroots organizations that could have an impact are structured as 501(c) organizations and are forbidden by law from actively participating in electoral politics.

Continue reading Primary Responsibility

Train to Maintain Safety

Guns Are Dangerous

In all of the hype and hullabaloo between gun groups and anti-gun groups, one thing that should not ever be forgotten is that guns can be very dangerous if not handled properly.  For people like my family, gun safety is ingrained from birth – possibly passed down genetically – and then reinforced on a constant basis.  But even so, it’s easy to make a mistake, and one momentary slip with a gun can have devastating, permanent consequences.  That’s why it’s so important to maintain a constant state of healthy fear – not fear of the gun, but fear of letting yourself become complacent and failing to follow the very simple, but inviolable, Four Rules of gun safety:

1.      Always treat every gun as if it’s loaded – even when you think it’s not.

2.      Never ever allow a gun to point at anything you are not willing to kill or destroy.

3.      Never let your finger enter the trigger guard until you’re on target and ready to shoot.

4.      Always be sure of your target and what’s beyond it before you touch the trigger.

Being an activist, advocate, and writer in the field of firearms and firearms law, I pay close attention to news and research regarding guns and gun injuries, and it seems that I’ve been seeing more reports of people – especially children – injuring or killing themselves or someone else by mishandling a firearm.  I hope it’s just an increase in the way these things are reported, not an actual increase in incidents – as is the case with “mass shootings.”  Nonetheless, it is a matter of concern.  Unintentional firearm-related injuries and deaths have been going down steadily for decades and we don’t want to see any slowing of that trend; even one is too many.

Continue reading Train to Maintain Safety

GA Weapons License

Everyone in Georgia is About to Die!

On Wednesday, the Governor of Georgia – the southern US state, not the Eastern European republic – signed a new law today which is tantamount to signing Death Warrants on thousands – if not tens of thousands – of his states citizens.  Or at least that’s what the anti-rights crowd and their friends in the lamestream media would have you believe based on the screeching headlines and breathless stories.

OK, maybe they weren’t quite that bad, but the headlines used terms like “Controversial,” “Unprecedented,” “Sweeping,” and “Guns Everywhere” to describe the new law which actually brings the Peach State’s gun carry regulations closer into line with the vast majority of other states.  In the stories themselves, there were almost always comments and quotes from professional anti-rights advocates like Mark (Mr. Gabby Giffords) Kelly, decrying the “irresponsible” nature of the law and insinuating that some dire consequences will inevitably result.  The Mike Bloomberg subsidiary, Moms Demand Action, called it “a very, very dangerous kill bill.”

What the bill actually does is ease blanket bans on carry of firearms in houses of worship (allowing each church, synagogue, etc. to make their own decisions on the matter) in certain government buildings that don’t have controlled entry with metal detectors, etc. to enforce a gun ban, and in bars and taverns.  It also gives school districts the option of authorizing some staff members to legally carry on school grounds, and provides a specific mechanism for someone who inadvertently carries a gun into the security area of an airport to legally backpedal and leave the area prior to going through the checkpoint.  In addition, it makes some adjustments to who can and can’t receive a license to carry.

Continue reading GA Weapons License

Reforming the Second Amendment

Justice Stevens’ Dishonest Diatribe

In a recently released book, retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens calls for fundamental changes to the founding document of the United States.  As a way of ginning up buzz about the book, the judge’s publicists gave a particularly controversial excerpt to the Washington Post for publication.  That section deals with the former Justice’s opinions on “reforming” the Second Amendment.  Justice Stevens thinks we should add the words “when serving in the militia” to the Second Amendment so that it would read: “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms when serving in the militia shall not be infringed.”

Obviously Stevens’ proposal would gut the meaning and protections of the Second Amendment.  Equally obvious, such a change would be impossible to pass through the process of amending the Constitution – at least any time in the foreseeable future. 

The learned justice’s diatribe is a mish-mash of emotional rhetoric based on invalid assumptions arriving at claims based on twisted logic and falsehoods.  I noted dozens of specific examples of such distortions in the short essay, but only have room to touch on a few here.

Continue reading Reforming the Second Amendment

Cop Killer Bullets

ATF Bans More Ammo

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives has declared that Russian 7N6, 5.45×39 rifle ammunition is “armor piercing handgun ammunition,” and therefore illegal for importation into the US.  The ammunition has been widely available in the US for decades and was originally designed for the AK74 service rifle, a smaller, lighter adaptation of the AK47.  The “handgun ammunition” label arises from an obscure Polish company importing a short-barreled, removable-stock model of the AK74 that is technically labeled as a pistol.  Since this “pistol” is chambered in 5.45×39, that cartridge has been ruled to be included under the definition “may be used in a handgun,” resulting in the 7N6 ammo, with its steel core, being forbidden for importation, sale, or manufacture in the US under provisions added to the Gun Control Act in 1986.

This ruling is particularly significant to us because the law it is based on was at the heart of the creation of our organization, The Firearms Coalition.  Back in 1982, a report on NBC News Magazine stirred up a huge controversy over a steel, Teflon-coated, pistol bullet called the KTW.  The bullet was designed primarily for police use in special circumstances such as dealing with assailants wearing body armor or hiding behind barricades, and had been on the market since the 1960s.  Though the ammunition was expensive, typically sold only to law enforcement, and had never been used to kill a police officer by penetrating his vest, it was nonetheless labeled as “Cop Killer Bullets.”  The hype grew and was even incorporated into popular movies like the absurd “Lethal Weapon 3.”

Continue reading Cop Killer Bullets