California’s Latest Gun Laws

California Dodges a Bullet – Catches Some Flak

California Governor Jerry Brown has wisely vetoed a number of anti-rights bills pushed through the State Legislature this year.  Unfortunately, he failed to veto all of the bad gun bills that made it to his desk this year – only the worst ones.

Among the dozens of firearms and hunting-related bills proposed in the California legislature this year, a total of 20 made it to the Governor’s desk.  Of those, Governor Brown signed 13 and vetoed 7.  The bills vetoed were some of the worst we’ve seen passed anywhere this year, and would have stacked onto some of the most restrictive gun laws in the country.  They included a bill that would have reclassified as “assault weapons,” any centerfire, semi-auto rifle capable of accepting a removable magazine – banning future sales and requiring that owners of those already in circulation register them.

This bill again proves the lie that the anti-rights crowd is only interested in restricting “weapons of war” and “military-grade hardware.”  Not only did the bill do away with the various cosmetic “military feature” tests typical of “assault weapon” bans, it abandoned all pretense that crime reduction is a motivating factor in passing these laws.  Of the guns affected by this ban, virtually none of them have been used in a serious crime in the past 50 years – if ever.  This was a case of hoplophobes trying to eliminate anything that they consider potentially scary, and, in essence, admitting that they’re scared of virtually everything.  Thankfully Governor Brown was wise enough to see that the bill would unduly burden the innocent while providing no additional safety or security to the people of California.

 Another vetoed bill would have restricted the resale of currently owned handguns that are not included on the California approved handgun roster.  More proof that gun control proponents ‘actions are based in irrational fears rather than any sort of reasonable concerns for public safety.  This bill originally would have completely banned resale of these guns, but it was amended to limit such transfers to no more than two per year.

The Governor also vetoed a bill that would have created exemptions in the law that forbids local jurisdictions from writing their own gun laws.  That law was put in place to specifically remediate problems caused by local jurisdictions creating a patchwork of laws making it virtually impossible for a gun owner to go about his business without transgressing some local ordinance – often resulting in serious consequences for the gun owner.

The other four bills vetoed by the Governor included one that would have made a criminal of anyone who failed to report the theft of a firearm within seven days, a bill that would have effectively banned gun shows at the Cow Palace event center, a bill that was apparently aimed at restricting a revolving rifle because it is capable of firing 410 gauge shotgun shells, and a bill that would have added people convicted of DUI offenses or minor marijuana crimes to the list of those permanently barred form firearm possession.

Bills the Governor didn’t veto are not all unicorns and rainbows though.  Among those was a bill signed early in the legislative session as an “emergency” measure which raided a special fund derived from gun buyer background check fees.  That move is currently in litigation by the NRA as an invalid tax on gun owners.

The bill that garnered the most attention this session was AB 711 which bans the use of traditional lead-based ammunition for hunting statewide.  This ill-conceived piece of legislation is supposed to help save condors, but the evidence shows that it ignores the most serious threats to the giant birds.  The law isn’t scheduled to go into effect until July of 2015.  This new law is complicated by the fact that many of the alternatives to lead-based bullets are at risk of being declared illegal under the 1986 federal armor-piercing bullet ban.

The rest of the bills the Governor signed will go into effect on January 1, 2014 and they include three separate bills dealing with “safe storage” aimed primarily at keeping guns locked up when children or prohibited persons might be able to get at them.  These ignore the reality that, if concern for my child’s life does not motivate me to take reasonable precautions, why would I be motivated to such precautions by enhanced legal liability in case my child did get my gun and a tragedy ensued?  The old adage remains true: you can’t fix stupid, and you certainly can’t fix stupid with legislation.  These bills will be impacted by litigation that is already underway regarding the constitutionality of laws which effectively limit a person’s access to their legally owned firearms.

Another issue addressed with multiple bills seems to have been inspired by too much time watching the TV show The Sopranos.  They deal with licensed therapists hearing a client make a credible threat to harm someone.  One bill requires therapists to report such threats within 24 hours, while another increases the proscription from firearms for making such a threat from the current 6 months to a whopping 5 years.  There is some significant concern as to how these laws will impact client relations and that they might discourage people from seeking help or being completely open with their therapist. 

There is some legal wrangling going on over the meaning of AB 48, which is supposed to stop people from constructing “large capacity” magazines from parts kits, not to mention questions about the constitutionality of the current restrictions on these magazines.  This too will probably have to be settled by the courts.

Future purchasers of any firearms will have to present a valid Firearm Safety Certificate, and companies which acquire “assault weapons” permits will have to include the names and personal information of the specific employees who will be in possession of these items. 

The Governor also signed legislation banning the trapping or commerce in bobcats from the area around Joshua Tree National Park, a bill permitting persons who become prohibited from possessing firearms due to indictments or restraining orders to transfer their firearms to a licensed dealer for safekeeping until the matter is resolved, and one requiring dealers to provide customers with copies of their Dealer’s Record of Sale paperwork.

While some of these new laws are going to be problematic and costly, and there will doubtlessly be some unintended consequences develop as a result of their adoption, the damage is not as bad as it could have been.  It looks like Governor Brown recognized how costly and ineffective the worst of the bills would be, and so, spared the state the pain and expense.  What this legislative session demonstrates most clearly though is the irrational and insatiable agenda of gun control zealots.  California has already proven that gun control doesn’t work, but proponents keep pushing more and more restrictive laws – either in a futile effort to control behavior by restricting objects, or out of irrational fear of those objects.  Either way, the result is always punishment of the law-abiding with no enhancement of public safety.  That’s just stupid.

Permission to reprint or post this article in its entirety is hereby granted provided this credit and link is included.    Text is available at    To receive The Firearms Coalition’s bi-monthly newsletter, The Knox Hard Corps Report, write to PO 1761, Buckeye, AZ 85326. Copyright © 2013 Neal Knox Associates – The most trusted name in the rights movement.