Why Not CIFTA

Obama Signs Press Control Treaty

             (April 30, 2009) In a surprise move last week President Barack Obama signed a treaty with a broad coalition of nations agreeing to limit "dangerous, derogatory, and politically biased information" from being disseminated across international borders.  The International Treaty on Fair and Responsible Dissemination of Information (which goes by the acronym BS-IDA in its original Chinese title) is intended to stop the flow of "confusing and conflicting news, ideology, and political philosophy" (referred to in the treaty by the acronym IDA) which causes so much rancor and even violence in many countries, particularly those countries which enforce rigid ideological standards and homogeneity of thought such as China, Cuba, North Korea, and Iran.

Continue reading Why Not CIFTA

Attention Fellow Webmasters

I got into a conversation with a webmaster for another gun rights site about technology and bugs and such.  We both felt a little concerned about posting questions on the support forums with links back to our site, lest we give some anti-gun hacker the keys to the store.  "Wouldn’t it be great," we both said at the same time, "if we could get a group of pro-rights webmasters together?"  I’ll be setting up a private forum at an undisclosed location.  Any webmaster of a bona-fide pro-rights site is welcome to join.  Send a note to me using the Contact Us link.  Include a link to your site.  I’ll send you a link to our bunker and the secret handshake.

 

Obama Tiptoes Around Semi-Auto Ban

Obama Tiptoes Around Semi-Auto Ban

Calls for passage of Inter-American Arms Treaty

Speaking in Mexico, the President today acknowledged his support for renewing the so-called "assault weapons" ban, but also showed respect for political power of the gun rights movement, saying that he and his administration might not have the political wherewithal to pass a ban.  Having sidestepped the call to pass a renewal, he then suggested enforcing existing law, pointing out that it’s already illegal to smuggle guns into Mexico.  A remarkable insight, Mr. President. 

Mr. Obama has put us on notice that he will pass the ban if he can muster up the political muscle.  It is the duty of the gun rights movement to see that any thought of a new ban remains expensive.  

 

April 17 Update

The Washington Times ran the Obama story in today’s edition focusing on Obama’s call for passage of the Inter-American Arms Tready (full text here) to mark guns with their country of origin and to establish all manner of tracing and registration schemes.

 

Hoplophobe Visions

Equipped to be a Killer

 (April 9, 2009) There is a funny story about a woman who rowed her husband’s boat out for a little solitude.  While she was enjoying the fresh air and sunshine a Park Ranger pulled up alongside and asked to see her fishing license.  When she told him she didn’t have one he said that he was going to write her a ticket because, even though she was just sitting in the boat reading, there was fishing equipment in the boat.  The woman replied that she wanted to charge the Ranger with rape then because, even though he was just sitting in his boat talking, he had all of the necessary equipment.

Unfortunately, in the real world, the woman’s quick wit would probably not get her out of the ticket and might cost her more charges, but there is a truth in this story that deserves careful consideration.  

Continue reading Hoplophobe Visions

Paranoia Breeds Paranoia

They’re Paranoid Because You’re Paranoid Because They’re Paranoid Because…

    The federal government’s latest warning to police agencies about "rightwing extremists" is an outrage and adds fuel to an increasingly volatile situation.  The report, titled, "Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment" was produced by the Extremism and Radicalization Branch, Homeland Environment Threat Analysis Division of the Department of Homeland Security, in coordination with the FBI.  It consists of 8 pages of what can only be described as paranoid ranting and conflation.  Here is how the report defines "Rightwing extremism:"

    "Rightwing extremism in the United States can be broadly divided into those groups, movements, and adherents that are primarily hate-oriented (based on hatred of particular religious, racial or ethnic groups), and those that are mainly antigovernment, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority, or rejecting government authority entirely.  It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration."

Continue reading Paranoia Breeds Paranoia

From Derek Bernard: British Faith In Gun Control

British Gun Restrictions: Nevermind The Results, It’s Faith

Our good friend Derek Bernard has sent another epistle from across the pond.  In his prvious piece he forwarded an op-ed by Richard Munday, another English friend, that explored the Mumbai incident in a historical context.  

The latest essay tracks the history of British gun restrictions back to the time just after the Great War of 1914-1918.  Prior to that time, guns were common in England, and the streets a good deal safer than they are today.  What particularly interests me is that the British Home Office’s concern about guns arose from that fact that WWI had trained a generation of men with skill at arms.  The hidden agenda of the early British gun control was to prevent a revolution such had already happened in Russia.  But the public excuse was, as always, crime.  England’s crime rate has been steadily rising for the past half-century, and with an increasingly heterogeneous population, one can expect that rise to increase.  I’ve been amazed over the past couple of years to see the debate over gun control in England appearing in the staid grey pages of The Times.  Richard and Derek are voices crying in the wilderness, but lone voices have made significant changes in the past. 

Derek submitted his story as a PDF file.  Read it here.

 

14 May Update

At Derek’s request I have replaced Derek’s earlier essay with an updated version.  The original contained a sentence that threatened to cause considerable legal trouble and given the state of British libel laws, Derek considered it more prudent to alter the essay.  He’s added some more information, and certainly it is still a strong statement.  It’s been altered to get rid of the potentially troublesome language.

–Chris

Did Pelosi Call for Registration?

Pelosi: "We want them Registered."

    When Nancy Pelosi said those words on Good Morning America she opened a can of worms she has been trying hard to keep hidden on a back shelf – but what was she really talking about?

    Pelosi’s comments have generated quite a bit of rhetoric from gun-bloggers and some rights groups, and I’m not coming to her defense in any way, but while we are critical of our opponents’ distortions and inaccuracies, we need to be doubly careful about our own accuracy.  Both Pelosi and the interviewer were struggling with spoken English during the brief interview and it is difficult to definitively say exactly what was meant by almost anything either of them said, but here’s my take.

Continue reading Did Pelosi Call for Registration?

Range Protection

Range Protection

The Noisy Wheel Gets the Shaft

By Jeff Knox

 

      (April 2, 2009) Range protection is a hot topic these days and it’s becoming more important every day.  Urban sprawl continues to envelope ranges and traditional shooting areas, pushing shooters farther and farther out to engage in their sport and training.  Developers build houses closer and closer to established ranges and soon the new residents are complaining about the noise.  While much of the emphasis in range protection has been focused on passing laws shielding ranges from noise complaints, such laws only provide limited protection and can give ranges a false sense of security.  Noise is just the tip of the iceberg and ranges need to guard against the mountain hiding beneath the surface.

Continue reading Range Protection

Guns in Mexico

The Truth About Mexican Crime Guns

    The often repeated statistic that 90% to 95% of guns seized in Mexico are traced back to the U.S. is an outrageous distortion.  The actual statistic is more like 17% and even that might be exaggerated.

    For several years The Firearms Coalition has been closely monitoring the situation on the U.S. – Mexico border as it relates to firearms.  Our good friend Landis Aden of the Arizona State Rifle and Pistol Association has provided a steady stream of news stories from Arizona and Mexico along with other useful information and blaming the U.S. for Mexico’s crime problems is nothing new.  What is a fairly recent development is the claim by U.S. and Mexican officials and media that 90% to 95% of crime guns traced from Mexico originally come from the U.S.  Anyone who knows anything about guns has been suspicious of that claim from the beginning because the guns described in the news stories are very often full-auto military weapons, rocket propelled grenades, and such; weapons which are clearly not available at your local gun shop in Phoenix or El Paso.

    The answer to the conflicting reports comes – as it often does in firearms related statistics – in the specific terms in which the statistics are couched.  It is true that about 90% of firearms traced by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives originate in the U.S. but what is left out of that statement is the fact that fewer than half of the guns involved in crime in Mexico are ever traced by the ATF.  Mexican authorities only submit guns to ATF when they believe the guns originated in the U.S.  When all of the guns are included it turns out that some 83% of guns involved in crime in Mexico come from sources other than the U.S.

   So the correct statistic is that about 17% of guns seized by police in Mexico are traced back to U.S. sources – and those doubtlessly include many guns legally sold to the Mexican government over the years and guns acquired by Mexican citizens for self-defense in the face of rampant crime in that country.

    Fox News has finally reported the truth of this matter in this special report.

    Rights activists are encouraged to send copies of this story to any reporter or news outlet they see repeating the 90% lie and to send copies to their elected officials demanding that government officials stop misrepresenting the facts.

Training Politicians

Training Bad Behavior

 

By Jeff Knox

 

(March 5, 2009) The Republican Party lost big in 2006 and lost even bigger in 2008.  They didn’t lose because of opposition to the war in Iraq.  They didn’t lose because of the floundering economy.  They didn’t even lose because of a "culture of corruption." Those were symptoms and side issues.  The reason Republicans lost, and continue to lose, is because they have failed to keep their promises, live up to their stated beliefs, and they have provided little reason to their base to get excited about keeping them in office. 

From taxes to abortion to free trade to fiscal responsibility, Republicans have routinely betrayed the trust of important issue groups and constituencies.  But no group has been betrayed, ignored, and taken for granted by Republicans more than gunowners.

Continue reading Training Politicians

Ammunition for the grassroots gun rights movement