Our friend Jim Shults of Shults Media Relations, LLC sent the following to his email list with the request that it be circulated within the pro-rights community. Jim is in Colorado which is may soon become the epicenter of the next fight over Second Amendment rihts. My take is that an amendment that makes a bad bill more palatable, and thus more likely to pass, is not good for our rights. One such “sweetener” is a “Grandfather Clause” which would exempt current owners from a ban or prohibition. The term has no meaning in law and is simply shorthand for some exception that exempts some currently-possesed items that would be otherwise banned. The actual wording is, as Jim points out, critical. It may mean that the grandfathered item is exempt from the ban and can be pass on to heirs or be sold, or it could mean that it is exempt only so long as the original owner is alive and must be in effect buried with the owner.
The idea that one generation could sign away the rights of the next generation is hateful and short-sighted anyway — not unlike passing a staggering debt on to the next generation, but that’s another topic. Here is Jim’s release. Read it and keep it in mind as the Gun Rights War heats up again.
Continue reading Beware the Grandfather Clause