A Closer Look at Some Lies

Unraveling More Gun Control Lies

By Jeff Knox

(December 18, 2014) In discussing the lies and distortions popular among anti-rights extremists – and their media supporters – I recently commented on their claims that “3000 children die in gun violence every year,” and that “gun deaths exceed traffic deaths” in this or that state.  I only mentioned these in passing, but I think they deserve more thorough scrutiny.bloomingnose

“3000 children are killed by guns every year!”

It has been said that a half-truth is like a half brick – it goes farther. The “3000 children” chestnut is a fine example of a lie that contains a half-truth. The total number of “children” – people nineteen or under – who died from gunfire has hovered around 2700 annually for several years.  No doubt it’s too high, but the number includes murders and suicides among teens.  In their propaganda pieces and campaigns like ASK (“Asking Saves Kids), the Brady Bunch and their media friends use the “3000 children” number to focus attention on accidental “gun deaths” deaths of children in the home, but a closer look at the numbers reveal a very different story.  According to the CDC, there were 110 unintentional, firearm-related deaths among children and youth age 0 to 19 in 2012.  While that is unacceptably high, it is a far cry from 3000.  It is also important to consider that this CDC statistic includes hunting accidents, teens who should have known better, and adults who accidentally shot children.  Still, the Brady Bunch implies that 3000 small children’s lives could be saved if parents would “just ask” about guns.  The implication is intentional and it is untrue.  In other words, it is a lie.

Continue reading A Closer Look at Some Lies

Even Names Are Lies

Anti-Gun Groups: Even Their Names Are Lies

By Jeff Knox

(December 12, 2014) Advocates for gun control are liars.  They specialize in taking some little snippet of fact and presenting it in a way that totally misrepresents reality.  Statements like “3000 children are killed with guns every year,” don’t inform people that most of those “children” are late-teen gang-bangers who are actually killed by adults, or that accidental firearm deaths among children and youths have been falling for decades and are currently at historic lows, despite the fact that guns and gun ownership are up dramatically.  The claim that “gun deaths exceed traffic deaths” in this or that state, conceals the fact that two thirds of those deaths are suicides, and that suicide rates in “gun friendly” states are comparable to rates in “gun restrictive” states.  Still these misleading “factoids” are unquestioningly parroted by “journalists” based solely on press releases from professional anti-rights lobbyists. 

Advocacy organizations like Bloomberg’s Everytown for Gun Safety, the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, the Gun Violence Policy Center, or the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, all have “gun safety” or prevention of “gun violence” in their names, but even their names are lies.  All of them focus exclusively on restricting firearms – gun control – while ignoring the fact that gun control laws have no impact on gun violence and no relation to gun safety. 

Continue reading Even Names Are Lies

Alabama Senate Loss Isn’t a Game-Changer

By Jeff Knox

(December 14, 2017) The dominant media industry is touting the election of a Democrat in Alabama’s special election as a shocking blow to the Trump administration and to Donald Trump personally.  They suggest that this really raises questions about Republicans’ ability to hold onto their narrow Senate majority in 2018, and basically proves that everyone really hates Donald Trump, and as long as he’s president, Republicans can’t win.  That may be wishful thinking.

Whether you believed the allegations against Moore were credible or not, this race wasn’t about politics or policies or even guilt or innocence.  This election was about credibility, and the voters of Alabama thought the accusers were more credible than Moore was, and they voted accordingly.

You might have noticed that sexual harassment became a big deal in recent weeks, and any credible accusation of sexual harassment, abuse, or other sexual misconduct is being taken much more seriously that it was just a few years ago – or even just a few months ago.

Had the accusations come out earlier, before the primaries, or at least before the deadline for replacing a candidate’s name on the ballot, the results may have been dramatically different.  As it was, Moore only lost by about one percentage point, and that’s pretty incredible given the gravity of the accusations and Moore’s clumsy response to them.

An establishment Republican would have easily won that seat, but a hard-line, anti-establishment Republican like Moore, would have won in a landslide, had it not been for the accusations.  So the fact that Moore lost only reflects on Trump to the extent that it was probably a bad idea for him to dive back into the race.

The really surprising statistic out of this race was the turnout of black voters, who turned out for white Democrat Doug Jones in greater numbers than turned out for Barack Obama in either of his elections.  That’s a pretty shocking statistic. It can only be explained by assuming that Obama and the Democrats basically ignored the heavily Republican state, making no serious effort at registering and turning out black voters, since they knew there was no way they could swing the state, while Jones’s team had a monumental outreach program into the black community, bringing in popular African American politicians and celebrities to get people involved.

But what does all of this mean to the balance in the Senate now and going forward?  Not much really. Republicans had a two-vote majority, 52-48, and now they have a one-vote majority, 51-49.  There was some faint hope that Republicans might be able to capture a filibuster-breaking supermajority of 60 seats.  That’s still a possibility, but losing an assumed-safe seat doesn’t help. Neither did having two Republican senators declare that they were retiring.  Incumbents usually have a significant advantage, so an open seat is never as good a bet.

There are 33 seats up for election next November, plus a special election for Al Franken’s seat.  Of those 33 Senate seats, 26 seats are currently held by Democrats (including two Independents who caucus and vote with the Democrats.

Those are pretty good odds for the Republicans, but it gets better.  Of the eight Republican-held seats up for election, seven are in states won handily by Donald Trump, as are 10 of the 25 Democrat-held seats.  If Republicans retain all of their current seats, they would have to win all 10 of those red-state Democrat seats. That’s a pretty tall order and there’s not much chance Republicans can pull it off.

The Arizona seat being vacated by Jeff Flake, would normally be a safe Republican bet, but the Democrats have fallen in behind an attractive candidate, while Republicans are building up to a what could be a bruising primary battle.  Nevada’s Republican-held seat is also in doubt. Hillary Clinton won the state, and Senator Dean Heller waffled on the Republican healthcare bill, managing to anger both Democrats and Republicans back home.

On the Democrat side, only five or six seats are at serious risk.  Republicans had better win at least a couple of those as a cushion for their tenuous majority.  In the end, we will probably see Republicans retaining their majority, but falling well short of a supermajority.

For GunVoters all of this means we will probably get more of the same going forward, with pro-rights legislation dead on arrival in the Senate, as Minority Leader Schumer (D-NY) will be sure to filibuster anything that is offered.

The only light of hope in the Senate is that the Democrats chose the “nuclear option” doing away with the 60-vote majority rule on cabinet and lower court appointees a few years ago.  Republicans followed suit on Supreme Court nominees this year, and that means that as long as Republicans have at least a 1-vote majority, or even a 50/50 split, with Vice President Pence casting the deciding vote, Trump can continue to appoint judges who abide by the Constitution.

But if Democrats manage to get 51 seats in 2018, all progress in the courts will run right into a brick wall.  I can easily see Schumer and company blocking all judicial appointments – especially any Supreme court nomination.  The majority in the Senate has total control over confirmation of judges and justices. That’s why a Republican Senate majority is important to GunVoters.

Both parties will be spending heavily on Senate races next year, because that control over judicial appointments is so crucial.  GunVoters need to be out in force to keep the Senate in nominally gun-friendly hands. We might not be able to get the legislation we want, but if we can’t get the courts back into Constitution-friendly hands, gun-friendly legislation won’t matter.

Get involved, and VOTE.

 

Who Needs a Gun on Campus?

Student Fighting for Concealed Carry Shot on Campus

By Jeff Knox

(December 4, 2014) Nathan Scott is a student at Florida State University in Tallahassee. He has a job working in the school library and is a member of Students for Concealed Carry at Florida State.  And he is a (barely) walking example of why his cause is so crucial, after being shot in the library recently and having no way to defend himself.

The group has been lobbying for several years to get the ban on lawful concealed carry of firearms on campus lifted. They argue that in a life-or-death crisis, when seconds count, police being just minutes away is not good enough. In the event of a violent criminal attack, they argue, a lot of damage can be done in the minutes – or seconds – before police can arrive. They say that a legally armed individual using a gun to save their own life could save many other lives as well. So far the collegians’ efforts to restore the right to arms on campus have been thwarted, leaving older students like Nathan, who qualify for a Florida Concealed Weapon License, with a choice of being defenseless, or risking expulsion and criminal prosecution.

The arguments in favor of banning all guns on campus generally revolve around “what if” scenarios: What if a licensee goes nuts? Or leaves a gun where someone irresponsible could get it? What if a licensee shoots at an attacker, but hits a bystander? What if police mistake the licensed student for the assailant and shot her? What if the licensee gets drunk or high on drugs (as, they remind us, so many college students do) and behaves irresponsibly with a gun?

Continue reading Who Needs a Gun on Campus?

Blooming Assault on Nevada

Blooming Assault on Nevada Gun Rights

By Jeff Knox

(November 26, 2014) While Mike Bloomberg and his billionaire buddies were spending upwards of $10 million dollars to implement a firearms registration scheme in Washington State, Bloomberg’s minions were hard at work initiating a similar assault on the rights of the people of Nevada.  Nevadans for Background Checks is a wholly owned subsidiary of Bloomberg’s Everytown for Gun Safety.  As typical with the Bloomies, the “group” is touted as a local grass roots effort, but is funded, directed, and staffed primarily by Bloomberg and his professional rights abusers.  A few local extremists are included as window-dressing. 

Everytown’s Washington, DC attorney reserved the Nevadans for Background Checks name with the Nevada Secretary of State’s office earlier this year.  Filing information for the PAC and nonprofit corporation formed to push for the initiative, which significantly changes the state’s firearm transfer laws, lists Tara Paone as “Director, President” of the nonprofit and as “Director” of the PAC.  Tara Paone is elsewhere listed as Treasurer for Everytown for Gun Safety in New York, and was listed as the Director of the Everytown fund in support of I-594 in Washington.  Ms. Paone’s LinkedIn profile says she is a professional manager for nonprofits and that she resides in New York City.  The address listed for her on the Nevada paperwork appears to be a street address, but is actually a Post Office box.  The other person listed on the PAC and incorporation paperwork, as Treasurer and Director respectively, is an attorney and lobbyist named Matt Griffin, who appears to be an actual resident of the state.

Continue reading Blooming Assault on Nevada

Guns Up – Crime Down

Hard Facts: More Guns but Less Crime

By Jeff Knox

(November 18, 2014) Crime and criminal violence tend to go up or down due to a variety of factors, many of them apparently not yet identified by criminologists and sociologists.  Poverty, the economy, unemployment, and illegal drugs are frequently point to as major factors, but for the past 7 years, as the US has gone through one of the worst recessions in our nation’s history. While we’ve seen high unemployment, unprecedented numbers of home foreclosures, and massive drug-related violence broiling in Mexico, violent crime in the US, including crime involving firearms, has been going down or holding steady. 

While politicians debate and billionaires expend millions of dollars convincing people to expand restrictions and record-keeping on gun sales, the problems they’re arguing about and supposedly addressing with their restrictions have been mitigating.  The media and paid “researchers” of the anti-rights crowd have successfully kept Americans’ attention focused on a few aberrations and away from the broader reality of declining crime. 

Continue reading Guns Up – Crime Down

No Guns for Gabby?

No Guns for Gabby?

By Jeff Knox

We all know that Gabby Giffords was injured in a murderous attack by a deranged Democrat activist.  We know that she suffered serious brain trauma and needed more than a year to regain even partial mobility and speech.  We also know that she has staged a remarkable recovery becoming the figurehead of a gun control operation started by her husband, Mark Kelly.  Rep. Giffords and Capt. Kelly often point out that they are not anti-gun and make show of buying, owning, and shooting guns.

Since we know all of that about Gabby Giffords, let me tell you about someone you don’t know.  We’ll call him Larry to protect his privacy.  Larry grew up in a shooting and hunting household.  As with so many working-class American gun owners, Larry is a patriot, and when he was 18, he volunteered for the US Army.  He went to Vietnam and was one of the last US casualties of that conflict when he was seriously injured by grenade shrapnel.  He suffered a traumatic brain injury and, like Gabby, had to relearn simple things like walking, talking, and feeding himself.  With help from his loving wife, Larry was eventually able to live a relatively normal life, though he suffers with frequent headaches and deals with severe pain that keeps him from being able to hold down a regular job.  The couple have depended on his small disability pension and what his wife has been able to earn cleaning other people’s houses.  One of his few joys has been getting out into nature and hunting – for meat and for the solitude he finds in it – or just tinkering and plinking.

Continue reading No Guns for Gabby?

Washington Loss Means More Work

Plenty of Work Ahead

By Jeff Knox

(November 6, 2014) Republicans won big on Tuesday.  Not only did they gain the majority in the US Senate, they also picked up seats in the House, state legislatures, and governors’ offices.  GunVoters played a significant role in many of those races.  The question now is what the Republicans are going to do with their new-found power?  They still have Barack Obama in the White House so they’re not going to have much luck getting controversial legislation signed into law, and they don’t have the votes to override vetoes.  The nation is still in the doldrums economically, and things are firing up in the Middle East again with Daesh murdering Christians and Western sympathizers.  And then there’s the issue of illegal immigrants and controlling the border. 

Throw into that mix the bad news out of Washington State where Initiative 594, criminalizing private firearm transfers, was passed by a 60-40 margin.  While 60% is a far cry from the 90% support for “universal background checks” that proponents of the idea continue to claim, it is enough to embolden those proponents to continue with their plans to bring similar initiatives to other states that offer the initiative process, and to keep pushing for state and federal legislation.

Continue reading Washington Loss Means More Work

Election Alert – Up to You

Now It’s All Up to You
 
Voting is not just a Right, it’s a Responsibility.
 
It’s time to get out and Vote.  Many have already voted through Early Voting programs, but many have not.  Mail Votes must be sent today or tomorrow to ensure arrival in time to be counted.  If you’ve already voted, make an effort to make sure others vote – and have the information needed to cast an informed ballot.
We’ve published several articles about the importance of this election and the critical issues being decided this year.  Please go to www.FirearmsCoalition.org to read and share our columns.

The Nation is Watching Washington

The two firearm initiatives on the Washington ballot this year will have serious impact on other states.

Bloomberg and his cronies are already working on similar initiatives in other states. While many have bought into the polling numbers and think this is an unwinnable fight, we’re not ready to give up. We’ve seen GunVoters do the impossible in the past, and we believe they can do it again. If you are in Washington State, you’re on the front lines of the fight for rights. I-594 is a dangerous and misleading initiative. Beg people you know to vote against it, and be sure that you and your family don’t miss your opportunity to make a difference. Especially be sure that everyone in your household knows how bad this initiative is.  don’t find out later that your vote was nullified because your wife thought I-594 seemed reasonable.

If you don’t live in Washington, do you know people who do?  contact them and urge them to vote NO on I-594.  The stakes are high for all of us.

For more information on I-594, see our special report at www.FirearmsCoalition.org.

For more information on the dangers of I-594, see our special report a www.FirearmsCoalition.org.

If you’re not receiving our bi-monthly newsletter, The Hard Corps Report, please consider subscribing atwww.FirearmsCoalition.org.  Also please consider making a donation to help us in the fight.

Please help us spread the word by “Liking” us on Facebook, and sharing our columns and information with your friends and family. 

Yours for the Second Amendment,

The Firearms Coalition
Inline image 1

A personal note from Jeff Knox:

For folks in the Helena, Montana area – or with friends in that area – my good friend Gary Marbut is running as an Independent for a seat in House District 94.

Gary is the president of the Montana Shooting Sports Association and the author of the Montana Firearms Freedom Act.  you can find out more about Gary and his contributions to the rights movement at www.ElectMarbut.com.

I personally endorse Gary and encourage readers to do whatever they can to help him to victory in this race.

Just in case Election Monitors are watching; This is an unsolicited, personal endorsement from me, Jeff Knox.  It was not coordinated with any campaign, party, or committee, and is not an official position of The Firearms Coalition.  Any cost associated with this statement in this email was paid by me personally.

This E-Alert was sent from The Firearms Coalition to our friends and supporters.  If it was forwarded to you, you can register for Alerts and Updates at www.FirearmsCoaliton.org.  We never share or sell your information. 

It’s All Up to You

It’s All Up To You

By Jeff Knox

Early voting has already started.  Getting out the vote is critical in any election, but especially so in mid-terms when there is no presidential race.  Whether it’s a matter of exposure or something else, for some reason people are less interested in voting when they’re not electing a president.  This year should get a better turnout than usual, but it still won’t be nearly as heavy as in presidential election years, and even 2012’s voter turnout was dramatically lower than it was for 2008.

Low voter turnout is a problem and an opportunity.  The problem is that it’s harder to get people motivated and voting during the midterms.  The opportunity is that the other side faces the same problem, so whichever side does the best job of getting their people turned out is the side that’s probably going to win.

I saw a poll today that should give Republicans something to worry about.  It was an unscientific poll of visitors to my friend Richard Viguerie’s website, ConservativeHQ.com.  The poll asked one question: Have you voted yet? 

It offered three possible answers:

1. No. 

2. Yes.

3. I don’t plan to vote in the 2014 midterm election. 

The response was rather startling, with 44% of respondents saying they had not voted yet, 32% saying they had already voted, and 24% saying they were not planning to vote.

Continue reading It’s All Up to You

Ammunition for the grassroots gun rights movement